Interview & Governance
New interview raises questions about who could control a UAP governance board
Attorney Danny Sheehan links David Grusch to past clearance reviews and describes a possible intelligence-heavy board structure; neither claim is independently documented in the report.
Briefed August 6, 2026 · Aliens in the Clouds
Reported Claim
UAPDrop published a new account on August 6 based on remarks from attorney Danny Sheehan previewed from an interview recorded for That UFO Podcast. Sheehan says David Grusch reviewed challenges to Christopher Mellon’s and Lue Elizondo’s security clearances after the 2017 New York Times reporting and concluded their disclosures had been authorized.
Sheehan also describes advocacy for Grusch to serve as chief of staff to a prospective UAP governance board and argues that intelligence-agency leaders may dominate its membership. The public article does not provide clearance-review records, a confirmed appointment, or an official board roster, so these details remain attributed assertions rather than verified government actions.
Why it matters
The claims identify specific records and governance questions that journalists and congressional overseers could test, while showing why a public mandate, membership list, and release policy would matter.
Published by Aliens in the Clouds. These AI-assisted summaries link to their sources and distinguish reported claims from established findings. Skinny Ed is a fictional mascot; High Thoughts are comedy. Send a correction with its source.