British MP puts UAP transparency questions on the record

In a new Sol Forum interview, Labour MP Clive Lewis joins Peter Skafish to explain why he submitted four parliamentary questions about UAP and how he reads the Ministry of Defence's responses. The conversation addresses British reporting policy, oversight, Five Eyes relationships, and the possibility that additional American disclosure could create pressure for a clearer British account.

The interview is meaningful because a sitting parliamentarian is publicly describing his own oversight effort, not because it supplies new sensor data or proves a hidden program. Lewis and Skafish discuss contradictions and disclosure scenarios, but the underlying claims about non-human intelligence or concealed technology remain unverified unless supported by records, testimony under accountable procedures, or physical evidence.

Why it matters

Parliamentary questions create a traceable public record and can test whether official policy matches practice, even when the answers do not settle the underlying mystery.

What the source establishes

Confirmed on-record interview and parliamentary activity. The discussion establishes Lewis's questions and views, not the existence of non-human craft or a secret recovery program.