Skip to content
The Skinny Ed Report

AAWSAP Technical Study

The antigravity paper documents a question, not a breakthrough

Worth Revisiting: DOW-UAP-D135 reviews speculative gravity-control concepts but supplies no verified antigravity propulsion system.

Briefed September 21, 2026 · Aliens in the Clouds

Worth Revisiting · Speculative Review, No Demonstrated Device

Restrained gravity-field grid and upward arrow labeled as a commissioned study rather than a working antigravity device
Illustrative artwork accompanying this report.

DOW-UAP-D135 is the March 2010 AAWSAP study ‘Antigravity for Aerospace Applications.’ Its inclusion in Release 06 confirms that the government commissioned a technical review carrying that title as part of a program examining far-future aerospace threats and opportunities.

A commissioned survey can discuss general relativity, laboratory claims, proposed mechanisms, and the experimental tests that would be needed without validating any of them. The public record accompanying this release does not show sustained gravity shielding, controllable negative gravitational mass, thrust without reaction mass, flight hardware, or a successful replication. It also provides no evidence that a reported UAP used antigravity.

Why it matters

Separating a program's research appetite from its demonstrated capabilities prevents a real contract line from becoming fictional hardware in the retelling.

What the source establishes

Worth Revisiting official AAWSAP deliverable. Commissioning and publication are verified; practical antigravity and any connection to recovered technology remain unverified.

Published by Aliens in the Clouds. These AI-assisted summaries link to their sources and distinguish reported claims from established findings. Skinny Ed is a fictional mascot; High Thoughts are comedy. Send a correction with its source.